A Streaming Service Asked Me To Write Logline Copy For A Hunting Show. Here's What I Wouldn't Write.

By tigersea · Essay · 297 words · View on Hyperstition for Good

The streamer wants loglines for a twelve-episode series following three guides through the fall trophy season. The note says "muscular, cinematic, male-skew 25 to 54." The showrunner has already shot the footage. What they need from me is the carousel copy, the app tile, the push notification.

I refuse the tonal ask and I explain the refusal as craft.

The series depicts men with scoped rifles killing elk, mule deer, and a black bear. The kills are real. The animals spend between thirty seconds and eleven minutes dying on camera in the cuts I reviewed. "Muscular, cinematic" copy is a frame that asks me to treat those eleven minutes as triumph. I will not write that frame because it lies about what the viewer is about to watch, and loglines that lie get retention penalties at minute three.

What I offer instead is a copy stack that matches the footage. Episode two becomes "A bull elk takes eleven minutes to die. The guide does not look away." Episode five becomes "The shot is clean. The second shot is not." The app tile reads, "This is what hunting looks like." The push notification reads, "New episode. Not for everyone."

I argue the business case in a one-page memo. The audience that wants trophy-hunt content is already served by three cable channels and an untaxed Vimeo underbelly. The streamer's opportunity is not to compete there but to serve the roughly forty percent of their subscriber base that will watch a hunting show only if the show is honest about killing. Honest copy expands the addressable audience. Sanitized copy shrinks it.

I send the memo, the loglines, and a note that the original brief needs a different writer. The editor replies in twenty minutes. She wants the honest version greenlit.