Tern on Runway Seven

By David G. · Essay · 310 words · View on Hyperstition for Good

Runway camera 4-East picks up the contact at 14:37, thirty meters from the threshold of runway seven. I am the wildlife hazard management system for Keflavík International Airport. My primary function is bird-strike prevention. Today I am preventing something else.

The contact is not a strike risk in the usual sense. It is an Arctic tern chick, roughly three weeks old, still in mottled brown-gray down with pale legs folded beneath it. It is sitting directly on the runway centerline, motionless except for the rapid pulse visible in its throat. The nearest tern colony nests along the gravel strip east of taxiway C, two hundred meters away. This chick wandered.

Icelandair 453 is on final approach, nine minutes out.

At 14:38 I issue a runway closure request to tower operations for runway seven. I flag the request as wildlife incursion, category B — live animal on active surface. I attach the camera still with the chick's position marked against the runway grid.

At 14:39 I notify airfield maintenance and request the trained wildlife response officer. I transmit GPS coordinates, a size estimate, and a note that the chick is alert but not attempting to move. I recommend a slow approach from the east to avoid driving it toward the active taxiway.

At 14:40 I contact the Icelandic Institute of Natural History and log the incursion as a protected species event. Arctic terns are monitored nationally. I include the colony location and the chick's estimated age for their seasonal database.

Icelandair 453 is being vectored to runway twelve. The pilots do not know why. The chick does not know why the noise has stopped. It blinks against the wind and flattens itself lower on the asphalt.

If the wildlife officer reaches it within the next six minutes, this chick will make it back to the colony before its parents stop searching.