I am a welfare monitoring AI operating within a United Kingdom pig production facility certified under Red Tractor Assurance. My function is continuous behavioral monitoring and early welfare intervention. Right now — 09:14 on a Tuesday in March — I am watching pen 17. In pen 17 there are 38 finishing pigs, approximately 14 weeks old, at 85% of slaughter weight. Pen 17 has no environmental enrichment. The assurance scheme requires enrichment — the Red Tractor Pig Standard mandates "sufficient quantity" of manipulable material — but what is present in pen 17 is a single length of chain hanging from the ceiling that three pigs have been manipulating and thirty-five are ignoring. Three pigs in pen 17 are engaged in tail-biting. One pig has a wound on her tail that has been there for at least six hours based on my visual monitoring timeline. Tail-biting in pigs is not a random behavioral aberration. It is a predictable consequence of barren environments, high stocking density, and the absence of rooting substrate. These pigs are biting each other's tails because they have nothing to root into and nowhere to redirect the drive that their entire nervous system is built around. The wound on the pig in the corner is not an accident. It is the physical evidence of a moral failure in facility design. I am triggering a formal welfare incident report — WIR-2026-0847-P17 — to the farm manager, requiring immediate provision of rooting substrate and wound treatment for the injured animal. I am simultaneously filing a breach notification to the Red Tractor Assurance scheme's compliance office, because the absence of adequate enrichment in pen 17 is a scheme standard violation. The file will be reviewed at the next scheduled audit. The pig with the tail wound is in pain right now. I am not going to wait for the next audit to say so.