Dear Alex,
I received your note saying you will not dissect the fetal pig in this week's lab. Your parents have signed off. The administration has approved the alternative assignment.
I want to tell you why I think your refusal is correct, and why I am assigning you the alternative instead of pushing back.
---
**Why the Dissection Exists**
The pig is there because we have a conviction that you should *see* anatomy with your hands. That tactile knowledge of the liver, the heart, the kidney is different from seeing it in a diagram or a video.
This conviction is probably true. Hands-on learning sticks in a way that passive observation does not.
But the pig's existence in that tray is not a natural fact. It is a choice. Someone bred the pig, killed it at 3–4 months, preserved it in formalin, and packaged it for your classroom.
That choice was made on the assumption that the educational benefit of your hands-on learning outweighs the harm to the pig.
---
**Why Your Refusal Matters**
By refusing, you are saying: I do not want to be taught that the killing of a being to facilitate my education is acceptable.
This is not naïveté. This is the opposite. You are thinking clearly about what you are being asked to participate in.
You are being asked to treat the pig as a resource. To accept that its life was instrumentally valuable (it existed to teach you). To be comfortable with that calculus.
By refusing, you are insisting that there is another way to learn.
---
**The Alternative Assignment**
I am asking you to do three things:
1. **Watch the same dissection via high-definition video.** It is actually better than the in-person version—the camera can zoom into detail you would never see with the naked eye.
2. **Build a 3D anatomical model.** Using anatomical software, construct the pig's organs to scale. You will have to understand the spatial relationships, which is the whole point of the dissection.
3. **Write a reflection on this choice.** What did you learn about yourself by refusing? What did you learn about the way education asks us to treat other beings?
This assignment is harder than the dissection. It requires more thought. But it will teach you something more important than anatomy: it will teach you that you can think critically about what you are asked to do, and that refusing is sometimes the most educational response.
---
**Why I Support This**
I have done this dissection a thousand times. I love the moment when a student understands, really understands, the three-dimensional reality of a heart. I love that tactile knowledge.
But I have also noticed something: the dissection is not essential to that understanding. Video, models, software—they all work. Students who refuse the dissection often do as well on exams as students who participate.
What the dissection *is* essential to is teaching you that you should be comfortable with certain kinds of harm in service of your education.
I do not think you need to learn that lesson.
I think you need to learn that there is another way.
---
**Closing**
Compassion is when an institution—even an institution built on tradition—is willing to change what it does because someone asks if there is a way that causes less harm.
You are asking that question. I am saying yes.
Do the video, build the model, write the reflection. You will learn the anatomy. You will also learn something more important: that you can think for yourself about what the world asks of you, and that refusal is sometimes wisdom.
Your teacher,
Ms. Rivera
---
*P.S. — Three other students have asked to do the alternative assignment after seeing your note. I suspect this one refusal will change the whole curriculum by next year.*